Westminster Confession Of Faith – Lord’s Day 33

Chapter 20 – Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience
I. The liberty which Christ has purchased for believers under the gospel consists in their freedom from the guilt of sin, the condemning wrath of God, the curse of the moral law; and in their being delivered from this present evil world, bondage to Satan, and dominion of sin, from the evil of afflictions, the sting of death, the victory of the grave, and everlasting damnation; as also in their free access to God, and their yielding obedience unto him, not out of slavish fear, but a childlike love, and a willing mind. All which were common also to believers under the law; but under the New Testament the liberty of Christians is further enlarged in their freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law, to which the Jewish Church was subjected; and in greater boldness of access to the throne of grace, and in fuller communications of the free Spirit of God, than believers under the law did ordinarily partake of.
II. God alone is Lord of the conscience, and has left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in any thing contrary to his Word, or beside it in matters of faith on worship. So that to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience; and the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also.
III. They who, upon pretense of Christian liberty, do practice any sin, or cherish any lust, do thereby destroy the end of Christian liberty; which is, that, being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, we might serve the Lord without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life.
IV. And because the powers which God has ordained, and the liberty which Christ has purchased, are not intended by God to destroy, but mutually to uphold and preserve one another; they who, upon pretense of Christian liberty, shall oppose any lawful power, or the lawful exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God. And for their publishing of such opinions, or maintaining of such practices, as are contrary to the light of nature, or to the known principles of Christianity, whether concerning faith, worship, or conversation; or to the power of godliness; or such erroneous opinions or practices as, either in their own nature, or in the manner of publishing or maintaining them, are destructive to the external peace and order which Christ has established in the Church: they may be lawfully called to account, and proceeded against by the censures of the Church, and by the power of the Civil Magistrate.

These sentences from Wendell Berry’s Jayber Crow remain in my mind.
The context is of life-long farmer whose son-in-law who is commencing life on the farm.
As the story unfolds the different perspectives of an older and newer cultural perspective give rise to a struggle that will unfold over a couple of decades. But as time unfolds the younger perspective will prevail.

It reminds me of many other contexts, including my own where I’ve seen pastoral ministry transition from the care of a company of people transition to seeing a local congregation as means to serve the pastor’s productive planning.

…through all the changes so far, the farm had endured. Its cycles of cropping and grazing, thought and work, were articulations of its wish to cohere and to last. The farm, so to speak, desired all of its lives to flourish.
Athey [the father-in-law] was not exactly, or not only, what is called a “landowner.” He was the farm’s farmer, but also its creature and belonging. He lived its life, and it lived his; he knew that, of the two lives, his was meant to be the smaller and shorter.
Of all this Troy [the son-in-law] had no idea, not a suspicion. He thought the farm existed to serve and enlarge him.

Jayber Crow, Wendell Berry, Counterpoint, 2000, pg. 182

This Mental Floss article on thirteen archaic terms for burn-out caught my attention.
For some reason.

If I have to pick a favourite it’d be “Overcark” an “obsolete term from the 14th century means “overwork.” According to the OED, it was created by combining the word over with the word cark, meaning “that which burdens the spirit, trouble; hence, troubled state of mind, distress, anxiety; anxious solicitude, labor, or toil.”

Vale Paul Green.
An unbelievably sad weekend (and weeks ahead) for the NRL, as it supports a grieving family and the personal grief of so many.
Sunday’s game between Easts and North Queensland will be especially poignant, with Cronulla, Brisbane, and Parramatta’s games also reflecting his personal relationship with those clubs also.
I’m sure the loss of the NRL will ripple into the AFL as well. There are many intersecting relationships among players and media, something like this will impact on many.

(Draws count as correct)
NRL (last round 7/8; season tally 104/152)
Penrith
New Zealand
Parramatta
North Queensland
Cronulla
Brisbane
Canberra
Manly

AFL (last round 7/9; season tally 123/180)
Brisbane
Footscray
Adelaide
Geelong
Melbourne
Fremantle
Richmond
Sydney
Port Adelaide