Is it ironic that this was posted on Crossway Publishing’s blog and I’m cross posting it on my blog?
Is it furtherly ironic that the post in itself is an adaption of material from Tony Reinke’s book Lit!
The content is, in my experience, true.
Fragmented Browsing vs. Sustained Comprehension
The Internet is designed to encourage us to browse information, not to slowly read and digest it. We jump from link to link and are driven by distraction. Book reading, on the other hand, can’t happen without disciplined and sustained linear concentration. Instead of browsing for fragments of information, we must learn to become deep thinkers who work hard to comprehend (2 Tim. 2:7).
If we fill our lives with fragments of information, our brains will adapt and our concentration will weaken. We will begin to find articles, chapters, and books increasingly demanding as our attention spans shrivel. Eventually we will find it difficult to stroll through long stretches of prose. Book readers must work to sharpen their attention. Like marathon runners who train daily to stretch their endurance, book readers must discipline themselves to read one book for thirty to sixty or ninety minutes at a time, struggling to increase their mental concentration.
Reacting vs. Thinking
Traditionally, a reader selected one book and sat alone in a reading chair. When great ideas were encountered, the reader internalized those ideas and reflected on them. If the reader encountered points of disagreement, the reader also stopped to reflect on what made the point disagreeable. Traditional readers engaged with a book and engaged their thinking.
This has changed with online social interaction. Now, when we come across an idea that we like, we are tempted to quickly react, to share the idea with friends in an e-mail, on Facebook, or on a blog. When we disagree, our initial response is to ask for the input of others. With online access to so many friends, the temptation is to react, not to ponder. Acting upon what we’ve just read, rather than stopping to meditate and think, is an impulse that we bring to reading books. I am quick to Tweet and slow to think. I am quick to Google and slow to ponder.
So ask yourself the next time you read: When you come across a provoking or perplexing portion of a book, what are you more likely to do: react or think? When you are tempted to react, stop, and simply think and meditate about what you are reading.
Ready Access to Information vs. Slowly Digested Life Wisdom
Valuable life wisdom flows out of meditation and deep thought. It’s easy to skim around for information online or to bounce from one fragmented detail to another. But the labor gets heavy when we determine to study a book for the purpose of gaining life wisdom. True learning and true wisdom are the fruit of long-term diligent study and meditation, benefits that we cannot get from books unless we are willing to slow our minds, mute distractions, and carefully think about what we are reading. Of all the people surrounded by data in the information age, Christians should be especially protective of the time required to slowly meditate (Proverbs 4).
Skimming with the Head vs. Delighting with the Heart
Lest we put all the blame on the Internet, however, the hasty reading of books appears to be a problem that predates Google. Puritan Thomas Brooks (1608–1680) faced this problem in seventeenth- century England. Brooks wrote,
Remember, it is not hasty reading, but serious meditating upon holy and heavenly truths, that makes them prove sweet and profitable to the soul. It is not the bee’s touching of the flower that gathers honey, but her abiding for a time upon the flower that draws out the sweet. It is not he that reads most, but he that meditates most, that will prove the choicest, sweetest, wisest, and strongest Christian.
Slow meditation on what we read is not only essential for gaining wisdom, it is also essential for experiencing delight.
In order to feel deeply about spiritual truths we must think deeply. And to think deeply we must read deeply. And to read deeply we must read attentively, not hastily. If we discipline ourselves to read attentively and to think deeply about our reading, we will position our souls to delight. But our souls cannot delight in what our minds merely skim.
Interesting article about a recently departing chief executive at Campbell Soups.
There are observations about how groups can fall into cultures that hinder or prevent progress in their stated missions.
It also makes me wonder how chicken and sausage gumbo tastes.
You know how suddenly wedding photos can’t just be the bride, groom, families and attendants but now have to be staged in all sorts of venues and set-ups because, y’know, the day isn’t quite memorable enough just because you’re getting married?
This photo should settle the issue forever.
Today I attended the ‘opening’ of a children’s memorial at the old Mount Gambier Cemetery on Lake Terrace, Mount Gambier.
The memorial serves as a focal place where the deaths of children who died before birth or during infancy, but for whom there is no marked grave, can be remembered.
I was unaware of the construction and did not know what to expect until I arrived.
While the situations which will draw folk to it will vary widely, I’m sure that most people will find it a most appropriate place for its purpose.
Some may find it too formal and austere in its heritage setting, other may find it too sentimental in its features.
As a public space, I think it finds as suitable a balance as would be possible.
This is a place that I dearly wish no-one would have cause to need, but I’m glad it exists for those who do.
For those who have suffered the death of an infant or child, the community of Mount Gambier affirms your sense of loss and has provided this space to support your need to grieve, mourn and remember.