Thom Rainer’s blog continues to feature helpful and interesting material on church leadership.
Here he posts about factors shared in common by churches which experienced a fresh season of growth, but did so with continuity in pastoral leadership.
Rainer explains:
So our research took a new twist. We only looked at churches that experienced breakouts without changing pastors. I was encouraged by our findings.
The Seven Traits
The breakout churches, almost without exception had seven common characteristics. Though I list them numerically here, for sequential purposes, I am not assigning priority by the rankings.
- The pastor had a “wake-up” call. He stopped denying that his church had a challenge. He became determined, in God’s power, to lead the church to growth and greater health. He would no longer be satisfied with mediocrity in God’s church.
- The church, under the pastor’s new leadership, developed clarity in its purpose. Most of the churches were previously activity focused. They were busy with the “what” without addressing the “why.”
- The pastor began assembling the right team for a new era of leadership. That team would include either paid staff or unpaid laypersons.
- The pastor developed a spirit of tenacity. He knew that the turnaround would not take place overnight. He followed a prayerful plan for the long haul.
- One of the early moves in these churches was to focus more ministries outwardly. The wake-up call noted above included an awareness that most of the ministries of the church were for the comfort and desires of the members. The leaders began to change that reality.
- The pastor and other leaders in the breakout churches had deep biblical faithfulness. They saw their mission emanating from God and written in His Word. That faithfulness was the push that moved them forward even in the midst of challenging times and potential discouragement.
- The pastor invested more time in the preaching ministry. He realized the centrality of the preached Word, and gave it more time and emphasis than any point previously.
The Hope Present in These Churches
Our quest to discover breakout churches that did not change pastors became an exercise in hope for our research team. We first saw how many leaders transitioned from a lackadaisical attitude to one of enthusiasm and possibility. Some of the leaders told us that their change was more dramatic. They described it as moving from hopelessness to great hope.
Of course, the other great encouragement in this project was discovering the story of entire congregations moving from a inwardly-focused lethargy to an outwardly-focused Great Commission mindset. By the time our research team saw these churches in the “after” mode, we found it hard to fathom they were once lifeless and discouraged.
If I found a single message in the scope of this research, it is simple but profound lesson for churches and their leaders: Don’t ever assume that your congregation has little or no hope. We found that many of these churches were once in despair, and many members confessed they had no hope. Then the breakout came. Then God showed He was wasn’t done with their church.That story could very well be the story yet to be told of your church.
The aspect of this which is perhaps not encouraging for those of us not in leadership positions, is that it seems that any change is seen as very much driven by the pastor down. So where does that leave ordinary Christians in a congregation whose pastor hasn’t had a “wake-up call”? Obviously it doesn’t absolve them of the need to pray for him, and to be living productive Christian lives themselves, but I wonder if our mindset is to focussed on human initiative (particularly in the leadership area) and not on God’s power. And I wonder from the seven points listed if the researchers focussed on the pastor, and not on the other parts of the body, all of which are vital for a healthy organism.
Caroline, I don’t have an easy response to that comment.
If you look at Rainer’s whole post you’ll see this is meant to be a contrast to situations where a time of growth has been associated with a pastoral transition.
What happens when there is growth without a change of leadership.
I don’t even know how this applies to the situation at mgpc. I’d like to think these traits are part of life here, and that I’ve sought to encourage them, and that we’ve refined them over the journey.
I’d say from my perspective here that mgpc have been generally encouraging of me in pursuing all these traits.
It’s easier to seek a comfort zone and we’re getting better at living without one.
None of these traits are a denial of God’s power. In posting them I was hoping they represent a way of trusting that and removing everything that obstructs us from doing so.
Thanks for your comment.
Thanks for the reply,
I think the way you put it: “removing everything that obstructs us” is a helpful way of putting it.
My comment was to some extent thinking out loud in response to something that seemed a bit pastor-centric. And thankfully I don’t come from a congregation where the pastor seems to need a “wake-up call”. There are Christians, though, who belong to such congregations, and I don’t think that the only answer is to leave and find a congregation with a “better” pastor (which you might think after reading that list, if there were no signs of change in your pastor).