Karl Vaters writes about allowing the reality of the Easter Story to speak to its own meaning when preaching over Easter.
Revolutionary.
The point he makes challenges in two ways.
Why rely on other stories to make a point the biblical story already makes?
Why rely on the biblical story to illustrate other points that the preacher wants to make in distinction from the point of the biblical story?
Read Vater’s brief post here.
Hi Gary,
just poked around this guys blog and it looks quite helpful. Is it a regular one you visit?